You are here
Home > Access to Information > Draconian laws hinder Media COVID-19 coverage

Draconian laws hinder Media COVID-19 coverage

Threats on media houses keen to investigate the shortcomings and evolution of the COVID 19 pandemic last year hindered adversely practitioners trying to provide objective, researched data on the plague and further frustrated efforts to nurture democracies, a report from the Reporters without Borders (RSF) has adduced.

With reporters attacked and arrested, their incomes falling and media undermined by disinformation and draconian laws, the coronavirus pandemic has compounded the huge difficulties for journalism in sub-Saharan Africa.

An average 23 of the 48 countries (two more than in 2020) were marked as red or black on the World Press Freedom map, implying that the situation is classified as bad or very bad.

The coronavirus crisis has made it evident that African journalists’ role in nurturing democracies built on fact-based and pluralist public debate is still far from assured.

Findings by the international media watchdog, founded in France in 1985 arguably to advocate for press freedom globally show that there was heavy censorship in covering the pandemic.

This was by those seeking to highlight some of the shortcomings in administering the pandemic by various African Governments hence the inducement of draconian laws to stifle media independence.

It argues,  there were three times as many arrests and attacks on journalists in sub-Saharan Africa between 15 March and 15 May 2020 as it did during the same period in 2019.

Many countries, including the continent’s most advanced democracies, it argued had resorted to force and legislation to prevent journalists from working.

While reporting on lockdown measures, one journalist ended up with a broken leg in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (down 1 at 149th). A woman reporter was hit by rubber bullets in South Africa (down 1 at 32nd)  while a WebTV director spend 11 months in prison in Rwanda (down 1 at 156th) before finally being released in March last year.

“Instead of allowing journalists to do their job of reporting the news, a role that is more essential than ever during such a crisis, authorities sought to control coverage of the pandemic and often facilitated or even directly contributed to hostility and mistrust towards those trying to provide objective, researched reporting.”

 Journalism, COVID-19’s collateral victim

The surge in abuses served as a reminder that African journalists are only too often regarded as enemies to be controlled or suppressed, rather than allies who can help address contemporary challenges and crises.

The marked increase in abuses is reflected in a 13% deterioration in the Index’s violations indicator for the region in the past year and is one of the reasons why Africa remains the world’s most dangerous continent for journalists in 2021, according to RSF analysis.

Acknowledgment of the key role investigative journalism plays in supporting democratic societies, including these societies’ abilities to deal with crises, is also still very limited across the continent.

In 2020, journalists in most African countries were sent  to prison for revealing compromising information about the authorities’ management of the pandemic, all trumped up charges.

The case in point is Zimbabwe in Southern Africa, sharing the border with Zambia whose rate dropped (down 4 at 130th). This was after authorities arrested Hopewell Chin’ono, an investigative reporter after he exposed overbilling by a company supplying medical equipment to combat the plague.

In Comoros (down 9 at 84th),  the situation remained hostile, Newspaper reporter Andjouza Abouheir was threatened with prosecution after she revealed that the country had reported no coronavirus cases because samples taken from persons suspected of being infected had not been sent for analysis.

Overall, RSF says, the pandemic helped undermine journalists’ independence and efforts to ensure governments carried out decisions based on facts.  In Tanzania (unchanged at 124th),  coverage of the impact of the coronavirus crisis was almost impossible because of the authorities’ denial of the facts.

The East African state had refused to order vaccines, so did Burundi (up 13 at 147th), whose president, Pierre Nkunrinziza, died a few weeks after his wife contracted Covid-19. Several countries.

These included South Africa, Botswana (up 1 at 38th) and Eswatini (141st), that had sought to criminalise the dissemination of “false information” about the virus, punishing violators with prison sentences.

Journalists treated as cyber-criminals

Like elsewhere in the world, African countries have suffered damage because of the glaring lack of transparency and effectiveness of moderation policies pursued by leading online platforms with regard to disinformation. Worse still, platforms have sometimes been guilty of censoring journalists, RSF notes.

On the other hand, Twitter suspended the accounts of  The Continent,  one of the most respected South African weeklies, along with the accounts of at least four journalists, for referring to Bill Gates’s opposition to removing patents on Covid-19 vaccines, or for referring to Twitter’s decision to block The Continent’s account.

By acting as apprentice information regulators while lacking the required legitimacy and without appropriate democratic safeguards, major platforms pose a danger to the freedom to inform.

African governments’ responses to these challenges have not offered more safeguards either – far from it. New regulations adopted hastily in recent years with the declared aim of combating “infodemics” have been used to silence journalists.

In Benin (down 1 at 114th), amendments to the “Digital Code” are clearly needed after it was used to sentence investigative reporter Ignace Sossou to six months in prison for accurately tweeting comments made by a public prosecutor.

A new cyber-crime law in Niger (down 2 at 59th) led to a blogger’s arrest, while in Senegal (down 2 at 49th), the press law now gradually taking effect maintains criminal penalties of up to two years in prison for defamation.

This is very disturbing, especially as neither the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) nor Somalia (up 2 at 161st) nor any other African country complied with RSF’s calls to decriminalise press offences in 2020.

A quarter of the arbitrary detentions of journalists registered by RSF in sub-Saharan Africa in 2020 took place in these two countries.

Hopes from changes in government dashed

The lack of progress with long-awaited legislative reforms in Gambia (up 2 at 85th),  Zimbabwe, Sudan (159th), Angola (up 3 at 103rd) and the DRC reflects a disturbing sluggishness in countries that have seen recent changes of governments or the removal of autocrats notorious both for their longevity and predatory treatment of the press.

They include Ethiopia (down 2 at 101st), which fell in the Index for the first time since Abiy Ahmed became prime minister in 2018.

Although the Ethiopian authorities launched a “fact-checking” initiative that was central to their relations with the media, journalists have long been prevented from visiting the country’s conflict zones. Some have been threatened.  Others have been arrested.

Journalism is still dangerous in Africa, especially when journalists cover elections or social unrest.

In Uganda (125th), the reelection of Yoweri Museveni, the country’s president for the past 35 years, was accompanied by a massive surge in abuses against journalists.

In the Republic of Congo (118th), Denis Sassou Nguesso began his fourth consecutive term as president with a journalist arbitrarily held in one of his country’s jails. Nigeria (down 5 at 120th) is now one of the most dangerous countries in West Africa.

Since 2019, three Nigerian journalists have been killed with complete impunity while covering street demonstrations.

The past year has brought no response about the fate of 11 journalists detained in Eritrea (down 2 at 180th) – now at the very bottom of the Index – 20 years after a crackdown that shut down all independent media outlets and sent journalists to prison camps or into self-imposed exile.

Similar Articles

Leave a Reply

Top